Search for: "Little v. Strange (PANEL)"
Results 1 - 20
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:29 am
” It’s a minor, but very strange, little phenomenon in the law. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
New Jersey Bell and the Strange Politics of Workplace Smoking,” the original sin is not imprisonment but a little secondhand smoke. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
Isn't it also a little strange that the three Ninth Circuit judges here are reviewing the (somewhat) ethical propriety of one of their colleagues? [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:13 pm
Scholars perhaps overuse the concept of a "crisis" (although it is eye-catching), but there is little doubt there are some strange doctrinal developments in U.S. conlaw. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
Here's what Justice Dondero (and the rest of the panel) has to say about it:The minimal probative value of the evidence was diminished further by the absence of similarity of both the setting and circumstances of the demonstration. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Even more strangely, in late 2013 and early 2014, as the WTO Panel is proceeding, the Guatemalan Congress approves the FTA and the Guatemalan President formally ratifies it. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:28 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court decision in Ricci v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:57 am
A panel of the court found 2-1 in Evans v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:12 am
The panel consisted of Judges Hawkins, McKeown, and Tallman. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
A while ago, I posted about the en banc oral argument in a Ninth Circuit case called U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:23 pm
Today, the en banc First Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:25 am
Loree, Jr. offers a detailed analysis of the oral argument in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
Panel III: Gender and Intellectual Property in the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:22 pm
(Circuit practice can be strange.) [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm
In oral argument, there was little support for that conclusion. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:29 am
MannKind raised almost $61 million in the offering, so HCW earned a little over $3 million, equaling 5 percent of the gross proceeds. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:36 pm
"Politics and standing make strange bedfellows, eh? [read post]
